The Advantages of a Portable SPR Instrument
The need for a simple, fast, yet sensitive diagnostic, screening, and molecular characterization tool is indispensable in clinical and research applications. There is a demand for a portable device which is user-friendly, low cost, rapid, and portable. It should also provide a highly sensitive and specific assay in real-time [1]. A portable surface plasmon resonance (SPR) instrument may be the answer.
Ever since Biacore commercialized its first SPR instrument in 1990, there have been other manufacturers who have entered the SPR instrumentation area. SPR instruments have mostly been sold to large pharmaceutical companies for drug discovery purposes [2] [3]. Many of these commercial instruments require trained personnel to operate and are not easily accessible, especially from the cost point of view. As a result, we have started to see in recent years more portable SPR instruments being introduced in the life science market.
In this blog, we will discuss the differences and advantages of a portable SPR instrument over large and high throughput commercial SPR systems.
Portable SPR vs. Large SPR System
Large commercial instruments are commonly used to obtain binding kinetics of drug candidates at a high throughput screening (HTS) capacity. Although not designed for HTS, a portable SPR instrument has the advantage of being flexible that can be reconfigured for multiple purposes such as bio- and chemical sensing, characterization of binding interactions, and assay development. Therefore, one can use such a portable SPR to perform any of these tasks in a rapid and easy manner. Another advantageous feature of a portable SPR is its modularity. For example, a portable SPR can be integrated with other add-on accessories to simultaneously perform spectroscopy, electrochemistry, and chromatography [3]. Table 1 gives an overview of the differences between a portable SPR and a large SPR system.
Table 1. Comparison of large and portable SPR instruments
Large SPR System | Small SPR System | |
Accessibility | Accessible often only in centralized labs through advanced booking | Any benchtop or even off-site, anytime |
Consumable Cost | High | Low cost sensor chips ranging from a few to tens of dollars per chip |
Maintenance Cost | High, yearly contract | Low to none |
Type of Operator | Trained personnel specifically for each SPR system | Any researcher, clinician, postdoc, or student |
Applications | Binding kinetics of drug candidates | Bio-/chemosensing, characterization of binding interactions, assay development |
Modularity | No | Yes |
Portable P4SPR™ from Affinité Instruments
Table 2. Features and benefits of the P4SPR
Features | Benefits | |
Compact, size of a lunchbox | Portability | |
Thin-film sensor | Highly sensitive to region ~200 nm from sensor surface. Well established area as opposed to localized SPR (LSPR) | |
Wavelength interrogation mode | Low equipment and maintenance costs, robust, and user-friendly | |
Label-free sample preparation | No need to buy purification kits and reagents. No effect on sample for kinetics and affinity. | |
Setup time to first analysis in less than 10 minutes | Simple setup | |
Real-time output | Fast results | |
Triplicate multichannel microfluidic cell with separate reference channel | Simultaneous acquisition of triplicate measurements Reference corrects for any fluctuation in temperature and bulk refractive index changes | |
Direct injection with micropipette | Long contact time for slow kinetics, Low sample volume | |
Integration with other techniques such as spectroscopy, microscopy, and electrochemistry | Flexibility in experimental setup and applications | |
Simplified software control with GUI |
|
Portability and Flexibility is the Key
Thank you for reading and watch out for additional blogs discussing SPR related topics such as wavelength vs. angle interrogation, planar SPR vs. nanoparticle localized SPR, and multiple channel SPR.
-
Julien Breault-Turcot and Jean-François Masson, “Nanostructured substrates for portable and miniature SPR biosensors,” Anal. Bioanal. Chem., vol. 403, p. 1477, 2012.
-
Arnoud Marquart, “SPRpages,” 2006-2020. [Online]. [Accessed 7 September 2020].
-
Carolina Gomez-Diaz, Benoîte Bargeton, Liliane Abuin, Natalia Bukar, Jaime H. Reina, Tudor Bartoi, Marion Graf, Huy Ong, Maximilian H. Ulbrich, Jean-François Masson, Richard Benton, “A CD36 ectodomain mediates insect pheromone detection via a putative tunnelling mechanism,” Nature Communications, vol. 7, p. 11866, 2016.
-
Thibault Brulé, Geneviève Granger, Natalia Bukar, Clarisse Deschênes-Rancourt, Thierry Havard, Andreea R. Schmitzer, Richard Martel, and Jean-François Masson, “A field-deployed surface plasmon resonance (SPR) sensor for RDX quantification in environmental waters,” Analyst, vol. 142, p. 2161, 2017.